You are currently viewing Top 4 Best  Expensive Gaming Monitors in 2024

Top 4 Best Expensive Gaming Monitors in 2024

Top 4 best expensive gaming monitors in 2024. If you haven’t bought a new gaming monitor in several years, you have missed out on a huge step forward that can make your gaming look great.

The latest model delivers an amazing combination of brilliant color and contrasts that rivals living room TVs, sharper visuals by packing more pixels into the panel, and a high refresh rate and adaptive sync technology for smooth, consistent gameplay.

A high-end monitor for creative professionals doesn’t have to be as responsive as a gaming monitor. Instead, they will focus on high resolution and color fidelity. They are usually adjustable and are often designed explicitly with multi-monitor setups in mind.

The table below outlines the Top 4 Best Expensive Gaming Monitors in 2024 professional monitors nowadays available in the market nowadays.

  • Outstanding color accuracy
  • Built-in correction
  • Support for multiple color spaces
  • 4K HDR display
  • Very clear display
  • A variety of customization
  • High level of connectivity
  • wide viewing angle
  • Simple and block design
  • Thick bezel
  • One of the most expensive monitors on the market

AIZO Color Edge CG319X 31-inch 

The ColorEdge CG319X 31-inch screen uses a 17:9 aspect ratio, so you can view images or videos at full or near-maximum resolution with plenty of room for the editing toolbar in use.

Because of the 17:9 aspect ratio, the resolution cannot exactly be called UHD, but the vertical dimensions (4096×2160) are the same. On a 31-inch screen, images are incredibly sharp. The Eizo ColorEdge CG319X is another very expensive and professional monitor,

Additionally, the monitor natively covers 98% of the DCI-P3 gamut, which is the highest level of color accuracy currently available in a monitor. It also uses additional tools such as the Digital Uniform Equalizer to reproduce consistent brightness and tone across the entire screen, which is unattainable on inexpensive professional monitors.

Beyond that, the Eizo ColorEdge CG319X offers a high degree of display customization accessible directly from the monitor itself, and contrast levels not often seen on IPS panels. If you’re working in bright or varied light, you’ll appreciate the anti-glare coating and a shield you can place around the edges of the monitor to avoid direct sunlight.

Combined with the high viewing angles provided by the IPS panel, the stand provides easy adjustment and wide viewing angles. Ultimately, the Eizo ColorEdge CG319X will be a better choice for creative professionals who prefer a PC over a Mac. It provides both HDMI and DisplayPort connectors, as well as multiple USB ports and a USB upstream port.

Designed for professional or commercial use, the ColorEdge CG319X is warranted for up to 5 years or 30,000 hours, covering both bright and dead pixels. This is by far the best warranty you can get, especially when buying such an expensive monitor.

Overall, the Eizo ColorEdge CG319X is an excellent monitor for true professionals. Despite the similarity in price, it would be too simplistic to say that the Eizo ColorEdge CG319X is a PC alternative to the Pro Display XDR above.

The degree of customization and features ultimately makes it more value for money than Apple products, but the slightly lower resolution and non-premium branding require a little more thought to come to that conclusion.

Additional explanation: The EIZO CG319X is a monitor in a different class than most displays, even those used in creative industries. This is a workhorse that has been in the studio for many years, and despite all the advanced options and settings, its features are so seamlessly integrated that you don’t have to worry about it.

Thanks to the built-in monitor calibrator, your monitor will always display the correct color at the correct luminance. If you need to check Rec., Adobe RGB is no problem in 2020.

Resolution is something we often overlook. This isn’t an issue here either, since your monitor can’t display the footage you’re editing at full resolution.

As with all pieces of truly professional kit, some of the clutter and detail of the design has been discarded to ensure maximum build quality and functionality over aesthetics, but it still looks good.

For studios, CG319X is the ideal solution. It’s sturdy enough to withstand being moved around, the carrying handle is helpful, and of course, the monitor’s display quality is excellent.

The size of the monitor is important, as is its price tag. This is a fantastic monitor, the best I’ve ever seen, but it’s up there. This is a high-end professional monitor, so it may be a bit overkill for consumer or semi-pro use.

If you need to be 100% certain that your monitor display is as accurate and good as possible, or at least almost perfect, this is the monitor for you. If not, you can save yourself thousands of dollars and check out some very good alternatives.

Are EIZO monitors worth the money?

Yes for many reasons. However, whether it’s worth the price difference depends entirely on your needs. The first reason is if you’re looking for a neat dual monitor setup, as Eizo offers daisy chain connectivity via USB-C output.

  • Best-in-class image quality
  • Excellent upscaling
  • Cognitive Processor XR
  •  Slight screen glare
  • Plain stockpile view

Sony X90J is one of the best mid-range 4K TVs

The Sony X90J offers almost everything you could want in a mid-range 4K LED-LCD TV. For the money, few LED-LCD TVs can match it in terms of picture quality and feature set, making it a best-in-class mid-range model. It also has two HDMI ports that support 4K/120Hz but suffers from screen glare issues.

The Sony X90J is pretty much everything we could want in a mid-range 4K LED-LCD TV. For the cost, few TVs can match it in terms of picture quality and feature set, so it’s best-in-class for the mid-range model, and despite being released in 2021, it still is.

It’s no surprise that the Sony X90J is a solid midrange TV. The Sony X900H/XH90, released in 2020, was one of the best TVs of the year for the same reasons. The Sony X90J is further enhanced with a cognitive processor XR that provides incredible upscaling and contrast control.

Of course, after the Sony X90J came out another more up-to-date version, the X90K. The Sony X90K features the same XR cognitive processor technology as its pricier counterparts and features a precision full-array LED panel for crystal-clear picture quality.

However, we still love the Sony X90J because it’s a basic 120Hz TV with two full-spec HDMI 2.1 ports, variable refresh rate, and automatic low-latency mode for the Xbox Series X and PS5 next-gen consoles. Array panel with local dimming for better black levels… Great value for money with a significant price drop in preparation for newer models as they become available.

There are still a few issues with setting up a new console on the Sony X90J, and a few issues with how the TV looks in broad daylight in a bright room, but the Sony X90J manages to deliver stellar performance. at a reasonable price.

Does Sony X90J support HDMI 2.1?

Yes, the Sony X90J supports two HDMI 2.1 ports (port numbers 3 and 4). Therefore, it offers 4K120 output, ALLM, eARC, and VRR.

Does Sony X90J support VRR?

VRR will be provided through a future firmware update.

Is the Sony X90J a good buy?

The Sony X90J impressed us after a month of use. We enjoyed being able to sit away from the monitor and in a more relaxed and sociable position when playing casual games. Thanks to Google TV’s implementation, movie and video streaming is handled when you need it.

The picture quality is everything you’d expect from a new TV, and most customers looking to upgrade should strongly consider the Sony X90J.

 What type of panel is used in the Sony X90J?

 It is assumed to be a VA panel.

Does Sony X90J support a VESA mount?

 Yes, X90J is VESA wall mount compatible. However, the bracket must be purchased separately.

  • Good response time.
  • High refresh rate.
  • Decent contrast ratio.
  • large screen size.
  • Black uniformity is poor.
  • Terrible local dimming.

Samsung Odyssey G9 49-inch Monitor 

Samsung Odyssey G9 is a super ultrawide gaming monitor. It features a large 49-inch screen with a 32:9 aspect ratio and a resolution of 5120×1440, equivalent to two 27-inch 1440p monitors side by side. It also features an aggressive 1000R curved screen, bringing the edges within your field of view.

Designed for gaming with a fast 240Hz refresh rate, native FreeSync variable refresh rate (VRR) support, and G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing. It doesn’t have a Mini LED backlight like the model it eventually replaced, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9, but it still has a VA panel with edge lighting and local dimming.

Samsung Odyssey G9 is great for gaming. It offers low input lag, fast response times, and high refresh rates for a responsive and smooth gaming experience. It supports FreeSync to reduce screen tearing and is compatible with NVIDIA’s G-SYNC.

However, there are limitations on the 240Hz refresh rate that can only be achieved with certain graphics cards that support compression. It also has poor black uniformity, making it unsuitable for gaming in low light.

Is the Samsung Odyssey G9 2K or 4K?

Odyssey Neo G9 comes with dual 4K resolution with a pixel count of 7680 x 2160. If you don’t recognize the math, it’s two 3840 x 2160 (4K) screens side by side. Samsung claims this to be an 8K monitor, but it’s not true 8K.

  • Brilliant 4K 144Hz Mini LED Panel
  • Excellent picture and color quality
  • Impressive HDR 1400
  • 1152 LED dimming zones
  • fantastic price
  • No HDMI 2.1

Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX 32 inches 4K Gaming Monitor 

Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX 4K gaming monitor on a wooden desk with keyboard, mouse, speakers, and microphone visible Highlight David Murphy/CNN. Asus’ ROG Swift PG32UQX has a gorgeous mini LED-backlit display that delivers near-perfect picture quality and supports 4K resolution at the highest refresh rate we’ve seen in our tests for the smoothest performance experience.

You probably won’t find a better combination of size, image quality, gaming features, and HDR performance. And we’d expect near-perfection for the PG32UQX’s only downside: its incredible price tag. If your gaming PC can handle 4K resolution and you can afford it, Asus’ PG32UQX is the display of choice.

This 32-inch IPS display supports 4K gaming at a maximum refresh rate of 144Hz, which is higher than most gamers will see frame rates when playing their favorite games at the highest quality settings.

The factory-calibrated picture is flawless out of the box, and the PG32UQX is compatible with Nvidia’s G-Sync and AMD’s FreeSync adaptive sync technologies for ultra-smooth gameplay. In our tests, it delivered an incredible luminance range of 377.4 cd/m2 (41.2–418.6 cd/m2), making it suitable for use in as bright a room as a dark gamer’s den.

The PG32UQX delivers stunning picture quality right out of the box. That said, unlike most displays, there is no simple “standard” presets, so you’ll have to choose according to your purpose. Also, if you choose a preset (starting with “Racing”), you’ll need to select the color space “clamp” or limits required for the game you’re playing (we recommend sticking to your monitor’s sRGB or DCI-P3). presets for everything you’re doing).

Whatever you choose, you’ll get great color accuracy. We measured the PG32UQX’s color gamut to be 98.8% and 99.9% for sRGB and DCI-P3, respectively, so basically whatever you choose, you’ll get the entire color space to work with.

The PG32UQX’s sRGB mode achieved an average DeltaE (a measure of color accuracy) of 0.74 in the grayscale and color swatch tests, which is impressive for a consumer monitor.

Color accuracy dropped to DeltaE 2.16 when switched to DCI-P3, but even that is closer to a regular monitor and shouldn’t be an issue for everyday use or gaming. (You’re more likely to notice oversaturated colors in DCI-P3 if you’re using this wide color space for apps and content built for the more limited sRGB colors.)

When tested at default settings, the PG32UQX’s average gamma-correction response time of 11.91 milliseconds was on the slower side of all the monitors we tested (twice as fast as the faster displays we evaluated). This is the average of all measurements taken of the display’s “gray to gray” time, or the time it takes for a pixel to go from one shade of gray to another.

Slow response times can cause “image retention” or blurring when elements move quickly across the screen, but I didn’t notice this when playing Overwatch and Valorant. When we were able to maximize the monitor’s high refresh rate with the “normal” overdrive setting, our (non-competitive) gameplay felt responsive and accurate.

Response times are on the slower side for a gaming display, but the monitor’s very low input lag (measured by TFT Central) shouldn’t be a problem since it doesn’t incorporate signal processing delay thanks to the display’s built-in. On the G-Sync module.

In practice, this means you can play fast-paced, competitive first-person shooters without issue. We can’t expect anything from a more expensive display than a stunning living room TV. I like the built-in OLED display on the front of the monitor, which can tell you current frames per second, input source, or other system stats once you install the secondary LiveDash software.

There are two USB 3.0 ports on the back panel of the display and another port on top of the monitor for a webcam. I’ve never seen it anywhere else, and it’s a very convenient design. The only omission of the display is minor.

They don’t come with built-in speakers, but integrated monitor speakers usually sound terrible. If you’re spending this much money on a monitor, shop for a great gaming headset or better desktop speaker.

The only omission of the display is minor. They don’t come with built-in speakers, but integrated monitor speakers usually sound terrible. If you’re spending this much money on a monitor, shop for a great gaming headset or better desktop speakers.

There is also no HDMI 2.1 input. With only one DisplayPort 1.4 connection and three HDMI 2.0 ports, it’s a bit harder to swallow given the price of this display.

The monitor supports both HDR10 and the excellent DisplayHDR 1400, but no Dolby Vision. This inclusion would have been the cherry on top of an otherwise killer display, but with the “regular” ol’ HDR10 it will probably fare just fine. I can’t turn the 32-inch display into portrait mode, and I hate that the RGB lighting stays on in standby mode.

If the PG32UQX simply exceeds your gaming budget, Asus offers a cheaper alternative: the PG32UQ. It’s similar but trades the Mini LED setup for a more standard edge-lit backlight. However, we think Gigabyte’s M32U is a better choice. It’s typically several hundred dollars cheaper than the cheaper.

Asus PG32UQ supports the same 144Hz maximum refresh rate but offers stronger color accuracy in sRGB mode. Both displays support HDR 600. By default, the PG32UQ has a slower response time, but by raising the overdrive level to 4 (out of 5), it can compete with the M32U.

There’s an HDMI 2.1 port on either display, perfect for gamers looking to connect one of their next-gen consoles for 4K gaming. If you need a 4K gaming monitor that’s less expensive than our top pick, we recommend sticking with Gigabyte’s display.

Price aside, there are other good reasons for not wanting to buy the PG32UQX. The most important is the 4K resolution. If your system can’t output decent frame rates at this resolution in your favorite games, a 4K display might not be the best choice for you.

You need to lower the image quality through in-game settings to make it playable. I don’t think it’s worth slapping worse-looking images on such a nice, expensive display.